Cases 71 - 80 of 107
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Integrated Installations, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2012cv11645
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund , Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund , Carpenters' Pension Trust Fund - Detroit & Vicinity and others
Defendant:
Integrated Installations, L.L.C., Robert Barnes and David Pendley, III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
Perry vs. Culliver, et al
as 1:2012cv00231
Plaintiff:
Wayne D. Perry
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver , Alabama Department of Corrections , Donny Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Culliver et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00154
Plaintiff:
Wayne D. Perry
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver , Alabama Department of Corrections , Donny Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Jones v. Robert Barnes, et al
as 11-15225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY N. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT BARNES, a.k.a. Doctor Barnes, DONNY MYERS and NEGASH TESEMMA, a.k.a. Dr. Temssa
Wolfe et al v. Alexander et al
as 3:2011cv00751
Plaintiff:
Tony Wolfe, Robert Barnes, Robert Davis and others
Defendant:
Paul Alexander, Monique Taylor, Debra Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Navarrete v. Barnes et al
as 2:2011cv01076
Plaintiff:
Julio Navarrete
Defendant:
Robert Barnes and - Hagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Enrique Soto Alvarez v. Robert Barnes
as 5:2011cv00381
Petitioner:
Enrique Soto Alvarez
Respondent:
Robert Barnes
Alvarez v. Barnes
as 2:2011cv00278
Petitioner:
Enrique Soto Alvarez
Respondent:
Robert Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jonathan Paul Michael Barber v. Robert Barnes et al
as 8:2010cv01837
Petitioner:
Jonathan Paul Michael Barber
Respondent:
Robert Barnes and Attorney General Edmund G Brown, Jr
Barber v. Barnes et al
as 3:2010cv02396
Petitioner:
Jonathan Paul Michael Barber
Respondent:
Robert Barnes and Edmund G Brown, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
