Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Barnett v. Tsham et al
as 3:2023cv01200
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Barnett
Defendant:
Capt. Jeff Tsham, Dep. Susan Fleming, Lt. Richard Bittick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAUDILL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01632
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CAUDILL, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Delbert Akers et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04957
Plaintiff:
Delbert Akers, Mark Alcorn, Lori Alexander and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Caudill v. SSA
as 7:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Robert Caudill
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Akers et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00760
Plaintiff:
Delbert Akers, Mark Alcorn, Lori Alexander and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Akers et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00760
Plaintiff:
Delbert Akers, Mark Alcorn, Lori Alexander and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
CAUDILL II v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv26769
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CAUDILL II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAUDILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv01597
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ROBERT CAUDILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAUDILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv82310
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CAUDILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
