Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Thomas v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq03032
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Thomas
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00214
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Thomas
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burnam v. Infoblox, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv05107
Plaintiff:
Korey Burnam
Defendant:
Infoblox, Inc., Robert D. Thomas, Remo E. Canessa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Donna L Achey, et al v. Infoblox, Inc., et al
as 5:2014cv02644
Plaintiff:
Donna L Achey and Lindsay E Durham
Defendant:
Infoblox, Inc. , Robert D Thomas and Remo E Canessa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Beqaj v. Infoblox Inc., et al
as 4:2014cv02564
Plaintiff:
Safedin Beqaj
Defendant:
Infoblox Inc. , Robert D. Thomas and Remo E. Canessa
Movant:
Paul Ansfield
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
State-Boston Retirement System, et al v. Infoblox, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv02500
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lopez, State-Boston Retirement System, Arkansas Teacher Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Infoblox, Inc., Remo E Canessa and Robert D. Thomas
Ansfield v. Infoblox, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv02500
Plaintiff:
Paul Ansfield
Defendant:
Infoblox, Inc. , Remo E Canessa and Robert D. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
THOMAS v. VEACH
as 2:2007cv00333
Petitioner:
ROBERT D THOMAS
Respondent:
R. V. VEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. McKee et al
as 2:2007cv01212
Petitioner:
Robert D Thomas
Respondent:
Scott McKee and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
