Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Rolon v. City of New York
as 24-1439
Plaintiff:
KAYLA ROLON, COREY GILZEAN, MICHAEL HERNANDEZ and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT, Mayor BILL DE BLASIO and others
Intervenor:
POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, INC.
Rolon et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv02548
Plaintiff:
Michael Hernandez, Kayla Rolon, Christopher Husary and others
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1 through 20, CITY OF NEW YORK, Sgt. Scott Haldeman and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Police Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bartie et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02329
Plaintiff:
Felicia Bartie , Daryl Bigelow , Denise Bigelow and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Co L L C, Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company of Georgia, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Garcia et al v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
as 0:2007cv03431
Plaintiff:
Gladys Garcia, Gladys Garcia, Gladys Garcia and others
Defendant:
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Garcia et al v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
as 0:2007cv03432
Plaintiff:
Gladys Garcia, Gladys Garcia, Gladys Garcia and others
Defendant:
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gladys Garcia, Et Al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00157
Plaintiff:
Gladys Garcia, Kelly A. Geil, Wanda F. Gray and others
Defendant:
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
