Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Williams et al v. Aramark et al
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Williams, Corey D. Lurry and Jamal Moore
Defendant:
Aramark, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. USA
as 2:2023cv02272
Petitioner:
Robert E Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. The People of the State of Illinois
as 3:2022cv02528
Petitioner:
Robert E. Williams
Respondent:
The People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Garden et al
as 3:2022cv00977
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Williams
Defendant:
Andy Garden, Troy Reed, Clayton Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 1:2016cv10250
Plaintiff:
Robert E Williams
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Dr. Obaisi, Dr. Martija and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCUTELLA v. COUSINS 3RD et al
as 1:2015cv00253
Plaintiff:
JHEN SCUTELLA
Defendant:
JAMES COUSINS 3RD, ROBERT E. WILLIAMS and WILLIAM GOOZDICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Superintendent
as 3:2015cv00478
Petitioner:
Robert E Williams
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. People of the State of California et al
as 2:2015cv02119
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Williams
Defendant:
People of the State of California, Sung, Gibney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2014cv01416
Plaintiff:
Robert E Williams
Defendant:
Dr Caldwell, S A Godinez, James Luth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 1:2014cv01113
Plaintiff:
Robert E Williams
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Dr Obaisi, Dr. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
