Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ford v. Stone et al
as 5:2024ct03001
Plaintiff:
Jarred J. Ford
Defendant:
Keith Stone, Sheriff Bond Surety, Major Allen Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. King et al
as 5:2023ct03317
Plaintiff:
Bryan Anthony Turner
Defendant:
Jordan B. King, Robert Evans, Joel G. Stadiem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00352
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. Cooper et al
as 2:2019cv00002
Defendant:
Seth Edwards, Spencer Merriweather, Mike Waters and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine D. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hooks et al
as 5:2017ct03113
Plaintiff:
Marlow Williams
Defendant:
Erik A. Hooks and Robert Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RATIONAL SEXUAL OFFENSE LAWS, ET AL. V. STEIN, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv00053
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RATIONAL SEXUAL OFFENSE LAWS , NC RSOL , JOHN DOE 1 and others
Defendant:
JOSHUA STEIN, ERIK HOOKS, ANDY WOMBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Morgan, et al
as 5:2016cv00244
Plaintiff:
Michael Lamont Moore
Defendant:
Michael Morgan, Andrew Whitley, Melissa Bisette and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DOE #1 et al v. MCCRORY et al
as 1:2013cv00711
Defendant:
PAT MCCRORY, ROY A. COOPER, III, FRANK PARRISH and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE #1 , JOHN DOE #2 , JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Woodard et al
as 5:2012cv00805
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Calvin Woodard, Clads E. Ownes, Robert Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Armstrong v. Purdue et al
as 5:2011cv00073
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Beverly Purdue, Eugene Conti, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
