Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Gunn v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01112
Plaintiff:
Robert Gunn
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GUNN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv03194
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GUNN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Gunn v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv22267
Plaintiff:
Robert Gunn
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gunn v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06267
Plaintiff:
Robert Gunn
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Robert Gunn
as 16-13452
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT GUNN
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gilbert, Carl v. State of Department of Health Services (Secretary) et al
as 3:2014cv00466
Plaintiff:
Carl C. Gilbert, II
Defendant:
State of Department of Health Services (Secretary) , Deborah McCulloch , Kay Morse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert, Carl v. State Of Wisconsin, Dept. Health & Service et al
as 3:2014cv00427
Plaintiff:
Carl C. Gilbert, II
Defendant:
State Of Wisconsin, Dept. Health & Service , Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center , Deborah McCulloch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER-BOLES v. HAMILTON COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2012cv00478
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER AMANDA KINYON, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ROBERT GUNN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TODD FRANKLIN and others
Plaintiff:
TAMRA TUCKER-BOLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Gunn v. USA
as 11-11879
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT GUNN
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
