Cases 1 - 8 of 8
CISNEROS v. NOVAN, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01066
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO CISNEROS
Defendant:
NOVAN, INC. , NATHAN STASKO , RICHARD D. PETERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
STEFANOWICZ v. NOVAN, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01015
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW STEFANOWICZ
Defendant:
NOVAN, INC. , NATHAN STASKO , RICHARD D. PETERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
MIRIYALA v. NOVAN, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00999
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MIRIYALA
Defendant:
NOVAN, INC. , NATHAN STASKO , RICHARD D. PETERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Sciabacucchi v. Burns et al
as 1:2015cv07506
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sciabacucchi
Defendant:
Ursula M. Burns , Charles O. Prince, III , Richard J. Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Keegan
as 14-3029
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT J. KEEGAN
In Re: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company ERISA Litigation
as 5:2003cv02182
Plaintiff:
Charles E. McNeillie, Larry West, Kipp Kearney and others
Counter Defendant:
George W. Loomis, Richard Lindstrom, Terry Wintermyer and others
Counter Claimant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Stephanie W. Bergeron, Donald D. Harper and others
Defendant:
Northern Trust Company, Samir G. Gibara, Robert W. Tieken and others
Petitioner:
Capital Invest and Goodyear Tire Workers Independent Unity of Topeka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
In Re: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company Securities Litigation
as 5:2003cv02166
Plaintiff:
Halpert Enterprises, Capital Invest, Judy Heacock and others
Defendant:
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Robert J. Keegan, Robert W. Tieken and others
Petitioner:
Alaska Electrical Pension Fund, Raymond Bergman and Flamina Holding A.G.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
