Cases 21 - 30 of 62
McClain et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02060
Plaintiff:
Travis Hager, Joshua Wikholm, Danny Braden and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Johnson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02057
Plaintiff:
Francisco Avila, Jacob Zimmerman, Joshua Thompson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brooks v. Johnson
as 3:2019cv03006
Defendant:
Robert Johnson
Plaintiff:
Lance C Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Barrett et al
as 4:2019cv00031
Defendant:
Polk County, Jannet Barrett, State of Iowa and others
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Johnson and Inger Denise Hall-Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allred et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2018cv01584
Plaintiff:
Louis J. Cognata, Julie Fowler, George Horstmann and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brothern v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv03037
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brothern
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections, Joshua McNeil, Michael DeWolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Iowa Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv03020
Petitioner:
Raymond Dean Boyd Cooper
Respondent:
Iowa Dept of Corrections, Attorney General, State Of Iowa and Robert Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Liebing et al v. Sand et al
as 1:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Roger Liebing , Gary McCool , Alan Lucas and others
Defendant:
Robert Sand , Kevin Cmelik , Tom J Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liebing et al v. Sand et al
as 3:2017cv00075
Plaintiff:
Roger Liebing , Gary McCool , Alan Lucas and others
Defendant:
Robert Sand, Kevin Cmelik, Tom J Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
