Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Doster et al v. Secretary of the Airforce et al
as 1:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
Hunter Doster, Jason Anderson, McKenna Colantanio and others
Defendant:
Frank Kendall, Robert Miller, Marshall Webb and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Andrea Corvi, Jonathan Oberg and Johnathan Nipp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Poffenbarger v. Kendall et al
as 3:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Michael Poffenbarger
Defendant:
Frank Kendall, Robert Miller, Richard Scobee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Marreon McGlory, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 21-2692
Plaintiff:
MARREON MCGLORY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LEE BATTLE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE BROWN, Warden, Kinross Correctional, ROBERT MILLER, Warden, Chippewa Correctional, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON and others
USA v. Robert Miller
as 21-3569
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT MILLER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rico v. Lordstown Motors Corp. et al
as 4:2021cv00616
Defendant:
Stephen S. Burns, Rich Schmidt, Julio Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rico, Robert Palumbo, Jesse Brury and others
Petitioner:
Joshua Betof, Globestar Systems Inc., FNY Managed Accounts LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Graham v. Todd County et al
as 1:2020cv00210
Defendant:
Todd County, Vernon Albro, Kentucky State Police Officers and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Remmele v. Hinkle et al
as 0:2020cv00135
Plaintiff:
Morgan Remmele
Defendant:
Kings Daughters Medical Center, Don Bailey, Danna Hinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Saul
as 1:2020cv01087
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Robert Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Filing Error
as 1:2019cv02098
Plaintiff:
Robert Miller
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
