Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Reece et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019dp20055
Plaintiff:
Sue Carolyn Reece and Robert Morris Reece
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. DeVos
as 1:2019cv00068
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris, III
Defendant:
Betsy Devos
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Ribar et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 2:2015cv03006
Plaintiff:
Donald Ribar , Erin Smith , Clifford Warwas and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hamby et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2013cv00096
Plaintiff:
William Davidson Hamby, Jr., Bobby Scruggs, Robert Morris and others
Defendant:
Victor Samuel Johnson, III, Tory Johnson and Assistant District Attorneys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Getz
as 3:2012cv00999
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris, Jr.
Defendant:
Laura J. Getz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 3:2012cv00940
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris, Jr.
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, (f/n/u) Logan, Laura Kastan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv13678
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris, III
Defendant:
United States of America and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Morris v. Conway
as 3:2011cv00211
Petitioner:
Robert Morris
Respondent:
Jack Conway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 1:2009cv00663
Petitioner:
Robert Morris
Respondent:
Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
