Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Jolliff et al v. City of Catoosa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Jolliff and Kyle Parnell
Defendant:
City of Catoosa, Oklahoma, Cody Workman, Robert Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cassidy et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01443
Plaintiff:
MARY CASSIDY, CHARLES ALLEN, RANDALL ALLISON and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
State of Texas v. Smithback
as 3:2022cv02149
Plaintiff:
State of Texas
Defendant:
Robert Norman Smithback
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smithback v. State of Texas
as 3:2022cv00680
Petitioner:
Robert Norman Smithback
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NORMAN v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2021cv15946
Petitioner:
ROBERT NORMAN
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert OstranderIn re: Robert Ostrander
as 20-1597
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT NORMAN OSTRANDER
RALSTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv33844
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT NORMAN RALSTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Smithback v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 19-50979
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT NORMAN SMITHBACK
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Smithback v. Davis
as 1:2019cv00924
Petitioner:
Robert Norman Smithback
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
