Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Kenneth McPherson v. Robert Patton
as 23-1938
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH MCPHERSON and ERIC SIMMONS
Defendant / Appellee:
DETECTIVE ROBERT PATTON and DETECTIVE FRANK BARLOW
Defendant:
BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES OF THE BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT and STATE'S ATTORNEY
McPherson et al v. Baltimore Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv00795
Defendant:
Dave Neverdon, Frank Barlow, Baltimore Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McPherson and Eric Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03309
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coleman v. Dowling et al
as 5:2016cv00292
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Latricia Coleman
Defendant:
Janet Dowling, Robert Patton, Braden Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steele v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2015cv01238
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline A Steele
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Robert Patton, Kameron Harvanek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Patton
as 15-6106
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTON SHAW
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT PATTON, in his official capacity as Director of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Craddock v. Poppell et al
as 5:2015cv00353
Plaintiff:
Zane Craddock, Jr
Defendant:
Lori Poppell, Jim Rabon, Barbara Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Dickerson et al
as 5:2015cv00317
Plaintiff:
Gary E Austin
Defendant:
Tonia Dickerson, Jim Rabon, Steven Longmire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. Baltimore Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv00834
Plaintiff:
Sabein Burgess
Defendant:
Baltimore Police Department , Gerald Alan Goldstein, William Ritz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunivan v. Dowling et al
as 5:2015cv00092
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dunivan
Defendant:
Janet Dowling, Robert Patton, Kenneth Edward Tate, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
