Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 196
Gulet Mohamed v. Jefferson Sessions III
as 17-7235
Plaintiff - Appellant: GULET MOHAMED
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, TIMOTHY J, HEALY, in his official capacity as Director of the Terrorist Screening Center and others
Defendant: ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and UNKNOWN AGENTS
Haiping Su v. NASA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-16818
Plaintiff - Appellant: HAIPING SU
Defendant - Appellee: NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION, an Agency of the United States, CHRISTOPHER SCOLESE, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator of NASA, SIMON PETER WORDEN, in his official capacity as Director of NASA Ames Research Center and others
John Dickson, Jr. v. U. S. Dept of Justice We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1365
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN M. DICKSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: LORETTA E. LYNCH, In her Individual capacity, acting under Color of federal and State Law, Acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise Under The (RICO) Act of Title 18 U.S. Code 1962, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his Individual capacity, acting under color of federal and state law, acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise, under The (RICO) Act of Title 18 U.S. Code 1962, DANA JAMES BOENTE, in his Individual capacity, acting under color of federal and state law, acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise, under The (RICO) Act of Title 18 U.S. Code 1962 and others
DRAKE et al v. ALEXANDER et al
as 1:2015cv01353
Plaintiff: THOMAS DRAKE , DIANE ROARK , ED LOOMIS and others
Defendant: KEITH ALEXANDER, MICHAEL HAYDEN, LANNY BREUER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ABULKHAIR v. THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv05677
Plaintiff: ASSEM A. ABULKHAIR
Defendant: THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, JAMES B. COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
GRANT et al v. HOLDER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01102
Plaintiff: SANDRA GRANT, DOUGLAS GRANT, HARRISON GRANT and others
Defendant: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rahinah Ibrahim v. USDHS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-16161
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Rahinah Ibrahim v. USDHS, et al
as 14-16160
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Trammell v. State of Delaware
as 14-1371
Plaintiff - Appellant: George K. Trammell, Father, Individually, and as Parent, Guardian and Next Friend of M. Doe, a Minor Child, Individually, Refer to Complaint for Further Party Text
Defendant - Appellee: State of Delaware, Office of the Executive Branch, c/o Jack A. Markell, Constituent Relations and others
Grant et al v. Holder et al
as 1:2013cv04144
Plaintiff: Sandra Gail Grant, Harrison Grant and Olivia Grant
Defendant: Eric Holder, The Federal Bureau of Investigation, Robert S. Mueller, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?