Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Eddie Jones v. Robert Taylor
as 13-60502
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDDIE RAY JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT TAYLOR
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. End Zone Entertainment L.P. et al
as 4:2013cv01240
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
End Zone Entertainment L.P. and Robert Taylor
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0521 Cable Communications Policy Act
West v. Taylor, et al
as 2:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
Donald Joseph West
Defendant:
Robert Taylor, Hill, Brain Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. City of Amarillo, Texas, Police Department et al
as 2:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
Donald Joseph West
Defendant:
City of Amarillo, Texas, Police Department, Robert Taylor, NFN Kuster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Taylor et al
as 2:2012cv00202
Petitioner:
Eddie Ray Jones
Respondent:
Robert Taylor and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vallot et al v Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 2:2012cv02222
Plaintiff:
Robert Taylor Vallot and Frank Vallot
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
USA v. Robert Taylor
as 12-10219
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT TAYLOR, also known as Smutty
Rice v. Taylor et al
as 1:2011cv00464
Plaintiff:
Samuel Rice
Defendant:
Robert Taylor and Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tortella v. Thurman et al
as 2:2011cv00113
Plaintiff:
Tobin Tortella
Defendant:
Cole Thurman, Kevin Korinek, Dewayne Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trujillo et al v. Thurman et al
as 2:2011cv00107
Plaintiff:
Claudia Trujillo , Marisa Trujillo and Martin Trujillo
Defendant:
Cole Thurman, Kevin Korinek, Dewayne Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
