Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Christopher Smith v. Robert Wilson
as 23-7140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER DEKOTA SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT WILSON, OFFICER CORBET and OFFICER BEADY
Wilson v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilson
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Harrington v. Salisbury et al
as 5:2022cv04050
Plaintiff:
Michael Harrington
Defendant:
Robert Wilson Salisbury, Sr and Robert Wilson Salisbury, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Young v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03411
Plaintiff:
Raheem Latif Young
Defendant:
Sergeant Cooper and Robert Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Wilson et al
as 5:2022ct03410
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dekota Smith
Defendant:
Sgt. Robert Wilson, Officer Corbet and Officer Beady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Cooper et al
as 3:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Raheem Latif Young
Defendant:
FNU Cooper and Robert Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherry v. Wilson
as 5:2022ct03212
Plaintiff:
Khirey Devonta Cherry
Defendant:
Sergeant Robert Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00294
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Woods v. South Carolina, State of
as 1:2022cv00184
Petitioner:
Robert Wilson Woods
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv04185
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilson and Dagna Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
