Cases 11 - 20 of 41
THOMAS v. STANEK et al
as 2:2014cv01415
Plaintiff:
BRANDON THOMAS
Defendant:
DANIEL STANEK , LUPPINO CHRISTOPHER , DAN RUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Dent v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 14-4060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WILSON DENT
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY CLINTON COUNTY
ALEXANDER et al v. FOCUS FIBER SOLUTIONS, L.L.C. et al
as 5:2014cv01681
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ALEXANDER , CHAD ALLRED , CHARLES BILLS and others
Defendant:
FOCUS FIBER SOLUTIONS, L.L.C., BEACON ENTERPRISE GROUP, INC., CMK RESOURCE GROUP L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MORRIS v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv00293
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILSON MORRIS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
POTTS v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2013cv05164
Plaintiff:
JIMMY POTTS
Defendant:
EDWARD MCFADDEN , RON PHILLIPS , WALTER REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. BUCKLEY & COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv04709
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILSON
Defendant:
BUCKLEY & COMPANY, INC., CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Dent v. Kerestes et al
as 1:2013cv01395
Petitioner:
Robert Wilson Dent
Respondent:
John Kerestes, PA State Attorney General and District Attorney of Clinton County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HYNSON v. WILSON et al
as 2:2013cv00614
Plaintiff:
SHAMEK HASAN HYNSON
Defendant:
ROBERT WILSON, EDWARD MCFADDEN, MORGAN TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dent v. Fritts et al
as 1:2013cv00078
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilson Dent
Defendant:
Marvin J. Fritts, Michael F. Salisbury and Lori A. Rexroth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. COHEN
as 2:2012cv05526
Petitioner:
ROBERT WILSON
Respondent:
DENNIS P. COHEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
