Cases 1 - 10 of 22
CANO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21634
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO CANO, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Soliz v. Nueces County et al
as 2:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Jesus Soliz
Defendant:
Nueces County, Sheriff John Hooper, Armar Correctional Healthcare Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CANO JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv14607
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO CANO JR and ROBERTO CANO, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santiago-Colon v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 3:2021cv01057
Respondent:
U.S. Marshals Service and Warden Roberto Cano
Petitioner:
David Santiago-Colon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garcia, et al v. Tyson Foods, et al
as 13-3013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADELINA GARCIA, ANTONIO GARCIA, JERONIMO VARGAS-VERA and others
Rivera-Crespo v. Gonzalez-Cruz et al
as 3:2013cv01004
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Rivera-Crespo
Defendant:
Jesus Gonzalez-Cruz, Roberto Cano-Rodriguez and Angel Burgos-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia, et al v. Tyson Foods, et al
as 12-3346
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ADELINA GARCIA, ANTONIO GARCIA, JERONIMO VARGAS-VERA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
TYSON FOODS, INC. and TYSON FRESH MEATS, INC.
Tyson Foods, et al v. Garcia, et al
as 13-3013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADELINA GARCIA, ANTONIO GARCIA, JERONIMO VARGAS-VERA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TYSON FOODS, INC. and TYSON FRESH MEATS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
