Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Sandoval et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv01975
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff:
Roberto Sandoval and Dora Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1.494 ACRE OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2020cv00334
Defendant:
Minerva Adamina Cantu de la Rosa, 1.494 ACRE OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, Maria Rebecca Sandoval and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Sandoval v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03716
Plaintiff:
Roberto Sandoval
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sandoval v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00855
Plaintiff:
Roberto Sandoval
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sandoval v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03600
Plaintiff:
Roberto Sandoval
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sandoval v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00432
Plaintiff:
Roberto Sandoval
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jose Sandoval v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71634
Petitioner:
JOSE ROBERTO SANDOVAL, AKA Mario Godoy Dorado
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Roberto Sandoval v. USA
as 18-11749
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERTO SANDOVAL, a.k.a. Charrita
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amaya v. AVT Title Services, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00086
Defendant:
AVT Title Services, LLC, Eric B. Darnell, KBMC Holding, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Marta Amaya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sandoval v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv00694
Petitioner:
Roberto Sandoval
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
