Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Anthony Hall v. Creative I Works, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv08409
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hall
Defendant:
Creative I Works, LLC, Robert White, Robert Appling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Pharrell Williams, et al v. Frankie Gaye, et al
as 15-56880
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
PHARRELL WILLIAMS, an individual, CLIFFORD HARRIS, Jr., an individual and ROBIN THICKE, an individual, DBA I Like'em Thicke Music
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
FRANKIE CHRISTIAN GAYE, an individual, MARVIN GAYE III, an individual and NONA MARVISA GAYE, an individual
Counter-defendant - Appellant:
MORE WATER FROM NAZARETH PUBLISHING, INC., STAR TRAK ENTERTAINMENT, INTERSCOPE RECORDS and others
Amicus Curiae:
MUSICOLOGISTS, 212 SONGWRITERS, COMPOSERS, MUSICIANS, AND PRODUCERS, PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE and others
BRACKETT et al v. THICKE
as 1:2014cv00252
Plaintiff:
NATHAN BRACKETT and DAVID ROTHROCK
Defendant:
ROBIN THICKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Bridgeport Music Inc., a michigan Corp et al
as 1:2014mc00073
Plaintiff:
Pharrell Williams , Robin Thicke and Clifford Harris Jr
Defendant:
Frankie Christian Gaye , Marvin Gaye III, Nona Marvisa Gaye and others
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Quash
Pharrell Williams et al v. Bridgeport Music Inc et al
as 2:2013cv06004
Counter Defendant:
Paula Maxine Patton, Geffen Records, Interscope Records and others
Plaintiff:
Clifford Harris, Jr, Robin Thicke and Pharrelll Williams
3Rd Party Defendant:
EMI April, Inc., Jobete Music Co., Inc. and Sony/ATV Music Publishing Acquisition, Inc.
Interested Party:
Los Angeles County CSSD - Interstate
Defendant:
Marvin Gaye, III, Does 1 through 10 inclusive, Nona Marvisa Gaye and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Riches v. Thicke et al
as 1:2008cv00790
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Robin Thicke and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
