Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Walker v. Kostopolus et al
as 2:2023cv00805
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Walker
Defendant:
Robert Kostopolus, Sue DeHann, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles, Kayla v. Sauk City Dept. of Human Services et al
as 3:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Kayla Robles
Defendant:
Sauk City Dept. of Human Services and Winnebago Mental Health Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jurado Jimenez et al v. GLK Foods LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00209
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Jurado Jimenez, Edgar Nieto Chavez, Jesus Jurado Ramirez and others
Defendant:
GLK Foods LLC and Ryan A Downs
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
Robles v. Brunswick Corporation
as 2:2018cv01809
Defendant:
Brunswick Corporation
Plaintiff:
Sandy Robles
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Robles v. USA
as 3:2018cv00890
Petitioner:
Saul Ivan Robles
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robles v. County of Milwaukee et al
as 2:2018cv01328
Defendant:
Richard R. Schmidt, County of Milwaukee and Richard R Schmidt
Plaintiff:
Sandra Robles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robles v. USA
as 3:2018cv00449
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Samuel Robles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Archer v. Chisholm et al
as 2:2015cv00922
Defendant:
David Budde, Bruce Landgraf, David Robles and others
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Archer
Amicus Curiae:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robles v. Widdman et al
as 1:2017cv00708
Plaintiff:
Cruz Robles
Defendant:
Jennifer Widdman, Avery Golden, Brian Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The John K. MacIver Institute for Public Policy, Inc. v. Schmitz, Francis et al
as 3:2016cv00539
Plaintiff:
The John K. MacIver Institute for Public Policy, Inc.
Defendant:
Francis D. Schmitz, John Chisholm, Bruce Landgraf and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
