Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kersey v. Rockbridge Regional Jail
as 7:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Kersey
Defendant:
Rockbridge Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kersey v. Rockbridge Regional Jail
as 7:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Kersey
Defendant:
Rockbridge Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kersey v. Rockbridge Regional Jail
as 7:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Kersey
Defendant:
Rockbridge Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horne v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Charles Ryan Horne
Defendant:
Chad Hamilton, Derek Almorode and Rockbridge Regional Jail Owners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Mediko et al
as 7:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Gavin Thomas
Defendant:
Mediko and Rockbridge Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Mediko et al
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Gavin Thomas
Defendant:
Mediko and Rockbridge Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURCHISON v MEDIKO, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
MALIK H. MURCHISON
Defendant:
MEDIKO, INC. doing business as MEDIKO CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, HOWARD CARLTON, BSN RN, COLONEL DEREK T. ALMARODE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Pelter v. Bryant et al
as 7:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Darryl L. Pelter
Defendant:
Roger Bryant, MaKayla Jorgenson and Rockbridge Regional Jail Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelter v. Bryant et al
as 1:2022cv00539
Plaintiff:
Darryl L. Pelter
Defendant:
Roger Bryant, MaKayla Jorgenson and Rockbridge Regional Jail Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lana Thomas v. Rockbridge Regional Jail
as 14-7186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANA R. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROCKBRIDGE REGIONAL JAIL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
