Cases 1 - 10 of 23
ROCKEFELLER v. SCARBROUGH
as 1:2018cv09588
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROCKEFELLER
Defendant:
JAMES SCARBROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROCKEFELLER v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07992
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROCKEFELLER
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROCKEFELLER v. DIKS et al
as 2:2016cv02324
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROCKEFELLER
Defendant:
JOAN DIKS and PATRICIA R. COBB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. One or More Unknown Named FCC Forrest City Low Compound Officers, et al
as 1:2013cv01357
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
One or More Unknown named FCC Forrest City Low Compound Officers, 50 John/Jane Does, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rockefeller v. Wolf's Bus Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01926
Plaintiff:
Helen L. Rockefeller
Defendant:
Wolf's Bus Lines, Inc. and Bruce J. Warshawsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks et al v. FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound et al
as 1:2011cv01095
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Defendant:
FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound, Dougless Williams, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Frederick Banks v. A. Whitaker, et al
as 11-2125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
A WHITAKER, Teacher, J TENOR, Education Supervisor, B STEELE, Teacher and others
Banks v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2011cv00669
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
A. Whitaker, Stevens, J. Tenor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
