Cases 11 - 20 of 186
Rodriguez-Arango #747888 v. Snyder
as 2:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Michael Rodriguez-Arango #747888
Defendant:
Unknown Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez-Robles v. Warden, FCI Elkton
as 4:2023cv01285
Petitioner:
David Rodriguez-Robles
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frazer v. Mullins, RN et al
as 5:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
John J. Frazer
Defendant:
P Mullins, RN, Amanda Miller, Crystal Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cromartie v. Hale et al
as 2:2023cv01802
Plaintiff:
Alton Cromartie
Defendant:
Dr. Arthur Hale, Mary Roush, Ashley Orsbone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez #979211 v. Davids et al
as 1:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
Ezra Rodriguez #979211
Defendant:
John Davids, Unknown Jax, Sabrina Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Medina-Rodriguez v. Robert Crompton
as 23-1172
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAM MEDINA-RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. ROBERT M. CROMPTON
Rodriguez-Arango #747888 v. Pancheri et al
as 2:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Michael Rodriguez-Arango #747888
Defendant:
Unknown Pancheri and Richard D. Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz #569152 v. Corrigan
as 2:2022cv00238
Petitioner:
Vicente Rodriguez Ortiz #569152, II
Respondent:
James Corrigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina-Rodriguez #957537 v. Crompton
as 1:2022cv00970
Plaintiff:
James William Medina-Rodriguez #957537
Defendant:
Unknown Crompton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jessie Johnpillai v. Annette Chambers-Smith, et al
as 22-3708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSIE JOHNPILLAI
Defendant / Appellee:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, HAROLD MAY, Warden, CHARLOTTE OWENS, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
