Cases 21 - 30 of 8,145
Honey v. Lombardi et al
as 1:2024cv02859
Plaintiff:
Devontae H. Honey
Defendant:
Lombardi, Rodriguez, Cook County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Monty Allen Hendricks
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Tyron Dyeralle Davis
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rueda v Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cesar Rueda
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY, Warden SHAWN EMMONS, Warden BRIAN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Burke et al
as 1:2024cv02715
Petitioner:
Andres Rodriguez
Respondent:
James M. Burke and D. Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Guadarama
as 3:2024cv00644
Petitioner:
Jesus Rodriguez
Respondent:
Jesus Guadarama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sencial v. Coll et al
as 2:2024cv00874
Plaintiff:
Steven Sencial
Defendant:
Arthur Coll, A Galvez, S Reina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Duclos v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
McGhee Tony Duclos
Defendant:
D. Smith, J. Servin, S. Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dumond, Daniel v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2024cv21301
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dumond
Defendant:
L. Rodriguez and Miami Dade Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
