Cases 1 - 10 of 321
Woodard v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024ct03126
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Woodard
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden L.B. Kelly, Safety Supervisor Muscle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Grant v. Deputy Angel Rodriguez et al
as 3:2024cv03021
Plaintiff:
Herman Grant, Jr.
Defendant:
Deputy Angel Rodriguez, Deputy Richard Sholtz and John Doe Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Hall v. USA
as 3:2024cv00317
Petitioner:
Lavarius Rodriguez Hall
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
US v. Julio Rodriguez-Diaz
as 24-6121
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JULIO RODRIGUEZ-DIAZ
McCreary v. USA
as 3:2024cv00307
Petitioner:
Jusamuel Rodriguez McCreary
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rodriguez-Salomon v. USA
as 3:2024cv00205
Petitioner:
Erick Yahir Rodriguez-Salomon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Martinez-Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02021
Petitioner:
Gencis Martinez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America
Defendant:
L.B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez-Diaz v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02022
Petitioner:
Julio Rodriguez-Diaz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv05947
Plaintiff:
Angel Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
