Cases 61 - 70 of 315
Price v. Doe et al
as 2:2019cv12874
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Richard Roe and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas P Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2019cv02091
Plaintiff:
Sara D Roe
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen (deceased) by and through her sister, Charlene M. Williams et al v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2019op45767
Plaintiff:
Amy Michele Tackett, Scott Dillon Lovito (deceased) by and through his mother, Kimberly LaPegna, Crystall Burton Campbell and others
Defendant:
Mallinckrodt PLC, Purdue Pharma, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoeltzel v. Pillsbury et al
as 2:2019cv12328
Defendant:
Tom Cargill, Lucas, Jane Roe and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Franklin Hoeltzel
Hyman v. Lewis et al
as 2:2019cv11821
Defendant:
Rochelle Phipps, City of Detroit, Detroit Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Veronica Hyman
Gravatt et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11374
Plaintiff:
Bob Hafler, Fred Mikolon, Matthew Stopczynski and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Morrow v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2019cv00351
Defendant:
John Doe, Richard Roe, Andrew Kooshian and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Morrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Jane Doe, et al v. Dean Boland
as 19-3205
Undetermined:
JANE ROE, DEAN MAYNARD BOLAND and JANE DOE
Debtor:
In re: DEAN MAYNARD BOLAND
Jane Doe, et al v. Dean Boland
as 19-3211
Undetermined:
JANE ROE, DEAN MAYNARD BOLAND and JANE DOE
Debtor:
In re: DEAN MAYNARD BOLAND
Lewis Williams v. Heather Cooper, et al
as 19-1215
Defendant / Appellee:
HEATHER COOPER, HUM, DR. LARSEN, CHARLES S. JAMSEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEWIS E. WILLIAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
