Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Kelley v. Quality Correctional Health Care et al
as 3:2015cv00843
Plaintiff:
Daniel George Kelley
Defendant:
Quality Correctional Health Care, Unknown Kern, Unknown Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berigan et al v. Harris County
as 4:2015cv00986
Plaintiff:
Brian P Berigan, Glen Carlisle, Aaron Sloan and others
Defendant:
HARRIS COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Delay v. T. Werlich, Warden, et al
as 15-30257
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH CORNELL DELAY
Respondent - Appellee:
T. G. WERLICH, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Pollock, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ENS LEGIS and others
Delay v. Werlich et al
as 1:2014cv03422
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cornell Delay
Defendant:
T G Werlich, USA, Ens Legis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roe et al v. Wade et al
as 4:2014cv00356
Plaintiff:
Deborah Roe, Philadelphia Daily News and David Rothrock
Defendant:
Dwayne Wade, NBA, Vanessa Stiviano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholas Roe v. Rodney Chandler
as 14-10234
Petitioner - Appellant:
NICHOLAS LEE ROE
Respondent - Appellee:
RODNEY W. CHANDLER
Roe v. United States of America
as 5:2014cv00024
Petitioner:
Nicholas Lee Roe
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stewart v. South Texas Intermediate Sanction Facility et al
as 4:2013cv03418
Petitioner:
Terry Wayne Stewart
Respondent:
South Texas Intermediate Sanction Facility, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Jane Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. Chandler, Warden
as 4:2013cv00721
Petitioner:
Nicholas Lee Roe
Respondent:
Rodney A Chandler, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Porter v. Scott et al
as 6:2013cv00099
Plaintiff:
Frazier Porter
Defendant:
FNU Scott, FNU Clayton, FNU Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
