Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Pittman v. Cardenas, et al
as 23-1232
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMANUEL PITTMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CARDENAS, BRYANT and ROLAND JACKSON
Pettigrew v. Long et al
as 1:2023cv01294
Plaintiff:
William S. Pettigrew
Defendant:
Long, Dorcey and Roland Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Reynolds, et al
as 23-1161
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
TERESA REYNOLDS, NATALIYA NICKELS, POWELL and others
Johnson v. Gregory et al
as 1:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Christopher Gregory, Jill Brady, Darren Cantor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Cardenas et al
as 1:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Pittman
Defendant:
Cardenas, Bryant and Roland Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Long et al
as 1:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Pittman
Defendant:
Jeff Long, Roland Jackson, Landee Zanotelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard et al v. American Inter-Fidelity Exchange et al
as 3:2022cv00645
Plaintiff:
Charles Howard, Shawntyle Jackson, Maui Howard and others
Defendant:
American Inter-Fidelity Exchange, Marka Transport, Inc. and Roger Graves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fox et al v. Long et al
as 1:2022cv02391
Plaintiff:
Jeb Fox, Jabari Johnson, Terance Wilson and others
Defendant:
Jeff Long, Brian Weaver, Roland Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Meckelburg et al
as 1:2022cv00669
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Meckelburg, FNU Deloacn, FNU Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Franson, et al
as 21-1022
Defendant / Appellee:
MARLIN, ASHLEY FRANSON, DARRELL SMITH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
