Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ramirez Reyes v. Garland
as 24-1573
Petitioner:
JOSE ROLANDO RAMIREZ REYES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
RAMIREZ v. FIVE STAR STAFFING, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv22572
Defendant:
FIVE STAR STAFFING, LLC, STAFFING BY CHARLES, LLC, ARAMARK SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ROLANDO RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv01363
Plaintiff:
ROLANDO RAMIREZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramirez v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv04189
Petitioner:
Rolando Ramirez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02871
Plaintiff:
ROLANDO RAMIREZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fredy Rolando Ramirez Chilel v. Merrick B. Garland
as 21-1801
Petitioner:
Fredy Rolando Ramirez Chilel
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00210
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FILING ERROR
as 1:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Grady Bolton
Defendant:
City Of Austin, Randy Dear, Manuel Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bolton v. City Of Austin et al
as 1:2017cv00077
Plaintiff:
Grady Bolton
Defendant:
City Of Austin, Randy Dear, Manuel Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramirez v. State Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv03274
Respondent:
Richard Buchter, Connie Gonzalez, George Kanellopolous and others
Petitioner:
Rolando Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
