Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rocha v. Zavaras, et al
as 11-1132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCO A. ROCHA
Defendant - Appellee:
A. ZAVARAS, CDOC Director, RON LEYBA, FMCC Warden, POTTER, FMCC and others
Rocha v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv01272
Plaintiff:
Marco A. Rocha
Defendant:
A. (I) Zavaras, A. Zavaras, Ron (I) Leyba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rocha v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv00357
Plaintiff:
Marco A. Rocha
Defendant:
A. (I) Zavaras, A. Zavaras, Ron (I) Leyba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrera v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv01229
Plaintiff:
Rosendo Herrera
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Ron Leyba, Ari Zavares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stamps v. Leyba
as 1:2009cv00074
Petitioner:
Ivan Comedore Stamps
Respondent:
Ron Leyba
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kopec v. Suthers
as 1:2008cv02655
Petitioner:
Michael Gerard Kopec
Respondent:
John Suthers and Ron Leyba
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
West v. Ortiz, et al
as 08-1055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST WEST
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE ORTIZ, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, CARL ZENON, Four Mile Correctional Center - Warden, RON LEYBA, Arkansas Valley Correctional Facility - Warden and others
Cessar v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2008cv00283
Plaintiff:
Gerald Cessar
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Aristedes Zavaras and Ron Leyba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tivis v. Beecroft, et al
as 07-1453
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL KEITH TIVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
PATTY BEECROFT, MD, RON LEYBA, (Warden) and JOE ORTIZ, Executive Director
Baldauf v. Garoutte, et al
as 07-1452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD BALDAUF
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANCES GAROUTTE, EUGENE E. ATHERTON, JOHN STONER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
