Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Ronald Emrit v. Sean Combs, et al
as 24-1310
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN COMBS, aka P. Diddy, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and ATLANTIC RECORDS CORP.
Ronald Emrit v. Progressive Insurance Co., et al
as 24-3217
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE CO. and STEPHANIE COURTNEY, p/k/a "Flo" from Progressive Insurance Co.
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 2:2024cv02158
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean "P. Diddy" Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Emrit v. Combs et al.
as 1:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean P. Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 2:2024cv10566
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean P. Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment, Atlantic Records and others
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit and RESTRICTED FILER Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Emrit v Combs, et al
as 3:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean "P. Diddy" Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Emrit v. Progressive Insurance et al.
as 1:2024cv00046
Defendant:
Stephanie Courtney, Progressive Insurance and Flo
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ronald Emrit v. Grammy Awards on CBS
as 23-5911
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
GRAMMY AWARDS ON CBS, dba Recording Academy/NARAS
Ronald Emrit v. Grammy Awards
as 23-3831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
GRAMMY AWARDS, dba Recording Academy/NARAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
