Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Emrit v. Jules
as 1:2023cv01344
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sabine Aisha Jules
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. Grammy Awards, The
as 3:2023cv00828
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Grammy Awards, The doing business as The Recording Academy/NARAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. Jules
as 1:2023cv00733
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sabine Aisha Jules
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Ronald Emrit v. Sabine Jules
as 23-5461
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
SABINE AISHA JULES
Ronald Emrit v. Kara Pratt, et al
as 23-5309
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY KARA PRATT, of Hillsboro, Texas, TEXAS BAR, TEXAS SUPREME COURT, Supreme Court of Texas Supreme Court Building and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5314
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Emrit v. Jules
as 5:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sabine Aisha Jules
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Emrit v. Florida Department of Law Enforcement, et al
as 3:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) Broward County, State Attorney's Office (SAO), Broward County Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ronald Emrit v. Kara Pratt, et al
as 23-5310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY KARA PRATT, of Hillsboro, Texas, TEXAS BAR, TEXAS SUPREME COURT, Supreme Court of Texas Supreme Court Building and others
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 3:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Kara Pratt, Texas Supreme Court, Texas Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
