Cases 41 - 50 of 128
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1025
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv03159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Emrit v. Secretary of Navy
as 8:2022cv03146
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Secretary of Navy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv03162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Emrit v. Special Agent in Charge of FBI Field Office
as 1:2022cv03160
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Special Agent in Charge of FBI Field Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ronald Emrit v. United States Naval Intelligence
as 22-2149
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES NAVAL INTELLIGENCE, LLOYD AUSTIN, Secretary and PENTAGON/ DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Emrit v. Special Agent in Charge of FBI
as 3:2022cv00752
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Special Agent in Charge of FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question-Violation of Constitutional Rights
Emrit v. United States Naval Intelligence et al
as 1:2022cv02821
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
United States Naval Intelligence, Lloyd Austin and Pentagon/Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
