Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Khalil v. The Heritage Foundation et al
as 1:2026cv05929
Pretrial Service:
Secretary Markwayne Mullin
Plaintiff:
Mahmoud Khalil
Defendant:
The Heritage Foundation, Victoria Coates, Robert Greenway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Consipracy to interfere with civil rights
United States of America v. Ayers (Kennedy)
as 26-1531
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, BERMON CLARKE, NIA GOVAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Ayers (Harrell)
as 26-1478
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, BERMON CLARKE, NIA GOVAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Ayers (Wright)
as 26-1420
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, BERMON CLARKE, NIA GOVAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wyman v. Sandoval
as 1:2026cv02008
Petitioner:
Ronn Wyman
Respondent:
Sandoval and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mohsen (a.k.a. Nerdeen Kiswani) v. Betar Zionist Organization, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv01585
Defendant:
Betar Zionist Organization, Inc., Ronn Torossian, Ross Glick and others
Plaintiff:
Nerdeen Mohsen and Nerdeen Kiswani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Consipracy to interfere with civil rights
Jackson v. Abney
as 2:2026cv00303
Petitioner:
Sha Ronn Jackson
Respondent:
Jametrice Abney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Colley et al v. City of Oakland
as 3:2025cv08006
Plaintiff:
Brian Colley, Carrie Dennis, Shanyce Jones and others
Defendant:
City of Oakland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Ayers (Clarke)
as 25-1869
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, NIA GOVAN, BERMON CLARKE and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
