Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Price v. Thompson et al
as 2:2023cv00693
Plaintiff:
Prince A. Price
Defendant:
Ronnie Thompson, William K. Marshall and Division Corrections Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holley v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2023cv00652
Plaintiff:
Robert Holley
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Ronnie Thompson, Delantay Boozer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevenson v. South Central Regional Jail Officers et al
as 2:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Dana Stevenson
Defendant:
South Central Regional Jail Officers, Warden of South Central Regional Jail and Ronnie Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kiser v. Thompson
as 2:2022cv00115
Petitioner:
Jeremy L. Kiser
Defendant:
State of West Virginia
Respondent:
Ronnie Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Young v. Muncy et al
as 2:2019cv00829
Defendant:
Captain Ronnie Thompson and Corporal Arthur Muncy
Plaintiff:
Joshua A. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Muncy et al
as 2:2019cv00559
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, Captain Ronnie Thompson and Corporal Arthur Muncy
Plaintiff:
Joshua A. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv02250
Petitioner:
Ronnie Thompson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jackson v. Lozano et al
as 2:2014cv01922
Defendant:
Carrillo, Dr. Homes, Alexis Lozano and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaffer v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2007cv00609
Plaintiff:
Douglas C Shaffer
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Melinda Guilfoyle, Ronnie Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
