Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Avery et al v. Kent County et al
as 1:2023cv00929
Plaintiff:
Kellie Sinke, Deborah J. Parker, Peter Avery and others
Defendant:
Kent County, Peter MacGregor, Kenneth D. Parrish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Other Civil Rights
Bond v. Verdecia et al
as 3:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Maurice Wesley Bond
Defendant:
Rosario Verdecia, Brian "Doe" and Rachel "Doe"
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Felicia Rosario v. William Cyrus, et al
as 22-5764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELICIA M. ROSARIO, (Cyrus)
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM RAY CYRUS
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Rosario v. Cyrus et al
as 3:2021cv00922
Plaintiff:
Felicia M. Rosario
Defendant:
William Ray Cyrus, Wells Fargo Bank, U.S. Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cahuec-Castro et al v. Worsham et al
as 3:2011cv00928
Plaintiff:
Pablo Cahuec-Castro , Myra Leticia Juarez , Ottoniel Perez-Piox and others
Defendant:
Lee Clark Worsham, Lee Gaines, John Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edward Gladston Pragasam v. Rehab Care Group, Incorporated, et al
as 11-1088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD GLADSTON ROSARIO PRAGASAM
Defendant - Appellee:
REHAB CARE GROUP, INCORPORATED and TRACY HUFF
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bell v. Zuercher et al
as 7:2010cv00072
Plaintiff:
Timothy U. Bell
Defendant:
M. Zuercher, P. Heffington, C. Linaweaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
