Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00101
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MONTGOMERY v. WARDEN OF USP TERRE HAUTE, IN et al
as 2:2021cv00020
Respondent:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, JEFFREY ROSEN and WARDEN OF USP TERRE HAUTE, IN
Petitioner:
LISA MARIE MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rosen v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00705
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet Manufacturing Corp, Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Christine Rosen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSEN et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv00626
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
317) 237-1000 (fax:
John T. Schlafer, John T. Schlafer and John T. Schlafer
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY LYNN ROSEN and LARRY ROSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VOXX INTERNATIONAL CORP. v. JOHNSON SAFETY, INC.
as 1:2016cv01780
Defendant:
JOHNSON SAFETY, INC.
Plaintiff:
ROSEN ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEMS, LLP and VOXX INTERNATIONAL CORP.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Swike v. Rosen et al
as 2:2013cv00377
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Swike
Defendant:
Jeffrey L Rosen and Trustmark Recovery Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sulivan v. Rosen
as 2:2010cv00434
Plaintiff:
Andrea Sulivan
Defendant:
Jeffrey L Rosen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rosen et al v. King et al
as 3:2010cv00127
Plaintiff:
Clifford Rosen and Alice Rosen
Defendant:
Jason King, Christopher Slager and South Bend Indiana The City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
