Cases 1 - 8 of 8
TERRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv66485
Plaintiff:
ROY TERRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ace Duraflo Systems LLC et al v. Pipeline Restoration Plumbing Inc et al
as 8:2018cv00780
Plaintiff:
Ace Duraflo Systems LLC, Pipe Restoration Inc and Pipe Restoration Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Does, Pipeline Restoration Plumbing Inc and Roy Terry
Padgett v. Terry et al
as 3:2016cv00084
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Padgett
Defendant:
Roy Terry, Nathan Goff, Paul Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman et al v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 5:2015cv00223
Plaintiff:
Willis Bowman , Danny Childers , Terry A. Fultz and others
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Terry et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00552
Plaintiff:
Gitta H. Terry and Roy Terry
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pipe Restoration Technologies LLC et al v. Coast Building and Plumbing Inc et al
as 8:2013cv00499
Plaintiff:
Ace Duraflo Systems LLC, Pipe Restoration Inc and Pipe Restoration Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Coast Building and Plumbing Inc, Does and Roy Terry
Scott v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2012cv00730
Plaintiff:
Roy Terry Scott
Defendant:
U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pipe Restoration Technologies LLC v. Coast Building and Plumbing Inc et al
as 8:2011cv00296
Counter Claimant:
Coast Building and Plumbing Inc, Coast Building and Plumbing Inc, Does and others
Unknown:
Alexander J Chang, Hubert H Kuo, Alexander J Chang and others
Counter Defendant:
Coast Building and Plumbing Inc, Does, Pipe Restoration Technologies LLC and others
Defendant:
Coast Building and Plumbing Inc, Does and Roy Terry
Plaintiff:
Pipe Restoration Technologies LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
