Cases 1 - 10 of 17
ROYAL CREDIT UNION v. HARTNELL et al
as 1:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
ROYAL CREDIT UNION
Defendant:
MILDRED L. HARTNELL, FREDERICK W. HARTNELL, RYAN T. BECHARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Royal Credit Union v. Hartnell, Mildred et al
as 3:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Royal Credit Union
Defendant:
Mildred L. Hartnell, Frederick W. Hartnelll, Ryan Thomas Bechard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Royal Credit Union v. Ryan Bechard
as 22-1030
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROYAL CREDIT UNION
Defendant / Appellant:
RYAN THOMAS BECHARD
Royal Credit Union v. Hartnell, Mildred et al
as 3:2021cv00810
Plaintiff:
Royal Credit Union
Defendant:
Mildred L. Hartnell, Frederick W. Hartnelll, Ryan T. Bechard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. A 2017 GMC Acadia with VIN 1GKKNXLS2HZ256796 et al
as 0:2021cv01608
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
A 2017 GMC Acadia with VIN 1GKKNXLS2HZ256796, $1,018.92 from Royal Credit Union account number 4569474440, $21,983.16 from Bank of America account number 374004337463 and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00565
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Englesby, Bruce v. Royal Credit Union
as 3:2020cv00221
Defendant:
Royal Credit Union
Plaintiff:
Bruce Allen Englesby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv03189
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv02825
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
