Cases 1 - 10 of 100
PHI HEALTH, LLC v. ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES, INC. d/b/a ANTEHM BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD et al
as 1:2026cv01918
Plaintiff:
PHI HEALTH, LLC
Defendant:
ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES, INC. d/b/a ANTEHM BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD, ACCUBURN OF WILLIAMSPORT, AISIN HOLDINGS OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Dossey v. Macias
as 26-50791
Plaintiff:
Christopher Royce Dossey
Defendant:
A. Macias, Robert Torres, Michael Gerke, Odessa Police Department Chief and others
Dossey v. Griffis
as 26-50776
Plaintiff:
Christopher Royce Dossey
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike Griffis, FNU McKinney, FNU Cox, Lieutenant and others
United States of America v. Broussard
as 26-5787
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CIEDRIC ROYCE BROUSSARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
ROYCE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2026cv00426
Petitioner:
SAMUEL ROYCE
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
2017 Rolls-Royce Wraith, VIN: SCA665C55HUX86516 (26-IRS-000338) et al
as 2:2026mc51096
Unknown:
2017 Rolls-Royce Wraith, VIN: SCA665C55HUX86516 (26-IRS-000338) and 2018 Porsche Panamera, VIN: WP0AF2A74JL142359 (26-IRS-000339)
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Dossey v. Griffis et al
as 7:2026cv00334
Plaintiff:
Christopher Royce Dossey
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike Griffis, Nurse Supervisor Robin McCullough and Nurse Lori Hodgkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2
Burse v. Fanduel Companey Gambling Sight
as 3:2026cv00910
Plaintiff:
Royce Burse
Defendant:
Fanduel Companey Gambling Sight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
