Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Horny v. Loiza et al
as 4:2026cv10612
Plaintiff:
Federico Charles Horny
Defendant:
Loiza, Tirado, Mayberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fregoso et al v. Management & Corporation
as 3:2026cv00262
Plaintiff:
Agustin Fregoso, Roberto Bowen, Adam Stanley and others
Defendant:
Management & Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Artis
as 26-2113
Petitioner:
In re: STEWART M. ARTIS, SR.
Respondent:
EMETERIO L. RUDOLFO, MARIE WARD and CRYSTAL GBRIDO
Garciaguirre et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 5:2026cv06345
Plaintiff:
Marc Garciaguirre, Tyree Burnett Jr., Joseph Flores and others
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., SK Hynix Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Artis
as 26-2101
Petitioner:
In re: STEWART M. ARTIS, SR.
Respondent:
EMETERIO L. RUDOLFO, MARIE WARD and CRYSTAL GBRIDO
Ramos v. Bisignano
as 5:2026cv03832
Plaintiff:
Rudolfo Valentine Ramos, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank J. Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01933
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02809
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States of America v. Hidalgo
as 26-1258
Defendant:
ESTEBAN RAMOS-CRUZ, EFRAIN HIDALGO, JUAN TORRES and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Old Guard Insurance Company v. Rodriquez et al
as 1:2026cv00073
Plaintiff:
Old Guard Insurance Company
Defendant:
Rudolfo Rodriquez, Emilio Pinon, Tomas Cavalier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
