Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Bennett et al v. Bannon et al
as 1:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Ret. Sgt. Craig T. Bennett, Francine M. Bennett, Aliyah M. Bennett and others
Defendant:
Eric J. Bannon, Kirk William Ruquet, Matthew R. Sarkissian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JONES v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS et al.
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JONES
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, SUPERINTENDENT, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Thomas Dewald v. French, et al
as 23-3268
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ANDREW DEWALD
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FRENCH, Franklin County Prison, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER REED, Franklin County Prison, LIEUTENANT GARY ARTER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Stone v. Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
Philip Stone
Defendant:
Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc., J. Warren Huff, Christy J. Oliger and others
Robert Ruff v. Warden Schuylkill FCI
as 23-2448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ANDRE RUFF
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SCHUYLKILL FCI
Owens v. Walker et al
as 4:2022cv01687
Plaintiff:
Christian Owens
Defendant:
Chloe Walker, Amber Warick, Coran Phiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruff v. Sage
as 1:2022cv01032
Petitioner:
Robert A. Ruff
Respondent:
Warden Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Calvin Brackbill v. Stephen Ruff, et al
as 22-1628
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN E. BRACKBILL
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN J. RUFF, GREGORY A. HILL, IAN L. DAWSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
