Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Stoutamire et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00457
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Conrad Stoutamire, Juan Provencio, Patrick Prudish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Deaton et al v. Stephens et al
as 2:2023cv00713
Plaintiff:
D Deaton, T Peake, J. K. D. and others
Defendant:
Patricia Stephens, Agnes Chappell, Alisha Ruffin May and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ruffin v. Drax Biomass, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Jacques Ruffin
Defendant:
Drax Biomass, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Ruffin v. Mobile County Metro Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00477
Petitioner:
Darrell Ruffin
Respondent:
Mobile County Metro Jail and Mobile County Court House
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruffin v. Jones
as 3:2021cv00640
Plaintiff:
Gerald Ruffin
Defendant:
Robert Luther Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Ruffin v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00833
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Ruffin
Defendant:
State of Alabama and C.O. I Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
