Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 229
Kennemore v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00467
Plaintiff: Daniel Eldon Kennemore
Defendant: State of Missouri, Donna Anderson, Stacey Neff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeune v. Rule
as 4:2024cv00224
Petitioner: Tamara Jeune
Respondent: Warden FNU Rule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Holland v. Warden Rule et al
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff: Justina Maria Holland
Defendant: Warden Rule, Shane Feeney, Captain Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFIN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2024cv00053
Plaintiff: JERAMIAH J. GRIFFIN
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FCC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WHITE v. RULE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00049
Petitioner: TERRANCE DEAN WHITE
Respondent: RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
TURNER v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00023
Petitioner: BERNARD TURNER
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
IRVING v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00014
Petitioner: DEJON IRVING
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CLARK v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00003
Petitioner: IZIAH CLARK
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CARR v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00002
Petitioner: TIMOTHY CARR
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WILLIAMS v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00006
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER L. WILLIAMS
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?