Cases 1 - 10 of 418
Charles Rush v. GEICO General Insurance Company
as 24-11123
Plaintiff:
CHARLES L. RUSH
Defendant:
GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gregory et al v. Trussville, Alabama, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Gregory, Amy Gregory and Gavin Gregory
Defendant:
Trussville, Alabama, City of, Eric Rush, James McCool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rush v. Sam's East, Inc
as 4:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Sarah Rush
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc doing business as Sam's Club, Store No. 4820
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Ledbetter v. Cloud 9 Online Smoke & Vape, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Hannah Ledbetter
Defendant:
Cloud 9 Online Smoke & Vape, LLC, Khalil Amor, Green Rush, LLC. doing business as Xhale City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rush v. Apple Card et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Jeanene Rush
Defendant:
Apple Card, Goldman Sachs Bank, Experian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Vernon Polk v. Lopez-Rivera, et al
as 23-14059
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VERNON S. POLK
Defendant / Appellee:
LOPEZ-RIVERA, V. MYERS, J SLOAN and others
Rush v. GEICO General Insurance Co.
as 0:2023cv62342
Plaintiff:
Charles Rush
Defendant:
GEICO General Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Rushing v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
April M Rushing
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jason Browning v. Bay Radiology Associates PL, et al
as 23-13842
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON M. BROWNING
Defendant / Appellee:
BAY RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES PL, CARL G. BAILEY, JR., EMILY D. BILLINGSLEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
