Labor Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rushing v. Securian Financial Group, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02816
Defendant: Fidelity Investments, Securian Financial Group, Inc. and Unilever Manufacturing (US), Inc.
Plaintiff: Keith Rushing
Not Yet Classified: Clerk and Master Virginia Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Johnson et al v. Trinity Couriers, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00686
Plaintiff: Christopher Johnson, Marcus Johnson, Veronica Renda and others
Defendant: Trinity Couriers of St. Louis, Inc., Trinity Couriers of DFW, Inc., Trinity Couriers of Houston, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bundy v. Rush Expediting, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00043
Plaintiff: Diana Bundy
Defendant: Rush Expediting, Inc. , Rush Transportation & Logistics , OneSource Employee Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Cameron v. Air Rush HVAC LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00498
Plaintiff: Derick Cameron
Defendant: Air Rush HVAC LLC and Drazen Katinic
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sheet Metal Workers Local Union 24 Joint Apprenticehip and Training Committee, and Scott Cosgrove, Scott Hammond, Jeff Rowe, Cameron Saunders, Tony Staten, and Jim Williams et al v. R&C Construction Services Co. LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv02083
Plaintiff: Sheet Metal Workers Local Union 24 Joint Apprenticehip and Training Committee, and Scott Cosgrove, Scott Hammond, Jeff Rowe, Cameron Saunders, Tony Staten, and Jim Williams , Sheet Metal Workers Local 98 Pension Fund, and Bob Billings, Scott Hammond, Jeff Rowe, Jeff Rush, and Greg Yoak , Sheet Metal Workers Local 98 Welfare Fund, and Bob Billings, Scott Hammond, Jeff Rowe, Jeff Rush, and Greg Yoak and others
Defendant: R&C Construction Services Co. LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Aupperlee et al v. Battle Creek, City of
as 1:2013cv01080
Plaintiff: Todd Aupperlee , Scott Barnes , Bradley Barney and others
Defendant: Battle Creek, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Detroit Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds v. Rush Construction Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv15357
Plaintiff: Detroit Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds
Defendant: Rush Construction Services, Inc. , Dave and Marty, Inc. , Martin G. Steudle, Jr. and others
Counter_claimant: Martin G. Steudle, Jr. , Marlene Steudle , David Marrocco and others
Counter_defendant: Detroit Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds
Sheet Metal Workers Local 98 Pension Fund, and Ronald Belford, Scott Hammond, Jeff Rowe, Jeff Rush, and Greg Yoak et al v. ISO Mechanical, Inc.
as 2:2012cv01077
Plaintiff: Sheet Metal Workers Local 98 Pension Fund, and Ronald Belford, Scott Hammond, Jeff Rowe, Jeff Rush, and Greg Yoak , Sheet Metal Workers Local 98 Welfare Fund, and Ronald Belford, Scott Hammond, Jeff Rowe, Jeff Rush, and Greg Yoak , Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 24 Retirement Savings Plan, and Scott Hammond, Neal Hartfield, Todd Hedrick, Paul Patterson, Jay Sharp, and Dennis L. Shuman and others
Defendant: ISO Mechanical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Larson v. Rush Fitness Corp. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00109
Plaintiff: Michael A Larson
Defendant: Rush Fitness Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sheet Metal Workers Local 98 Pension Fund et al v TMM.LTD
as 2:2011cv00123
Plaintiff: Sheet Metal Workers Local 98 Pension Fund, And Ronald Belford, James Finley, C.W. Park, Jeff Rowe, Jeff Rush, And Greg Yoak, As Trustees Of The Fund , Sheet Metal Workers Local 98 Welfare Fund, And Ronald Belford, James Finley, C.W. Park, Jeff Rowe, Jeff Rush, And Greg Yoak, As Trustees Of The Fund , Sheet Metal Workers Local No 24 Retirement Savings Plan and Scott M Hammond , Neal Hartfield, Paul Patterson, Sam Schaffer, Jay Sharp, And Dennis L Shuman, As Trustees Of The Fund and others
Defendant: TMM, Ltd , Kevin J Taylor and West Bend Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?