Cases 31 - 40 of 2,846
Harrison v. CIR
as 24-20025
Plaintiff:
William Russell Harrison
Defendant:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Dori L. Stricklin, Group Manager, Miguel Pineda and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cornett v. Saul et al
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Russell Cornett
Defendant:
Roland Saul, Christopher Straud, Brooks Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
The Mississippi Bar v. Russell
as 3:2024ad00001
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Rhett R. Russell
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Tupac v. Asbury Automotive Group Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Mr. Michael David Tupac and Michael David Tupac
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group Inc, Asbury Arlington MB, LLC, Malcolm Russell Gage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Kelly v. First NBC Bank
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Russell Kelly
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Company as Receiver for First NBC Bank, Jose Carlos Mendez, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Mosely v. Vault Reciprocal Exchange
as 3:2024cv00014
Defendant:
Russell Long Mosely and Vault Reciprocal Exchange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Organogenesis Inc v. Melcher
as 2:2024cv00006
Not Classified By Court:
Organogenesis Inc.
Defendant:
Russell Melcher
Russell v. Harris County
as 24-20005
Plaintiff:
Dwight Russell, Johnnie Pierson, Joseph Ortuno and others
Defendant:
Harris County, Texas and Ed Gonzalez, Sheriff
Intervenor:
State of Texas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
