Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Campbell v. Smith
as 0:2017cv00065
Petitioner:
Hugh Russell Campbell
Respondent:
Thomas Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
T. Bryan v. Russell Campbell, et al
as 13-35388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
T. TERELL BRYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RUSSELL CAMPBELL, DIANE S. HOEHING, DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY U.S. and others
T. Bryan v. Jon Ozmint
as 12-6076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
T. TERELL BRYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, DONNA HODGES, JIMMY SLIGH and others
Defendant:
FBI, SLED, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
T. Bryan v. Russell Campbell, et al
as 11-35121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
T. TERELL BRYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RUSSELL CAMPBELL, DIANE S. HOEHING, DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY U.S. and others
Bryan v. Campbell et al
as 1:2010cv01977
Plaintiff:
T Terell Bryan
Defendant:
Russell Campbell, Diane S. Hoehing, Defense Technology U.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan v. Campbell et al
as 3:2010cv00641
Plaintiff:
T. Terell Bryan
Defendant:
Russell Campbell, Diane S. Hoehing, Defense Technology U.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2009cv00640
Plaintiff:
Gerald M Evans
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Jon Ozmint and Russell Campbell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv00159
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Buchanan v. Campbell et al
as 3:2007cv03623
Plaintiff:
Stewart Buchanan
Defendant:
Russell Campbell, John Soloman, John Alewine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Campbell v. Corinth Police Dept. et al
as 1:2007cv00059
Plaintiff:
Russell Campbell
Defendant:
Corinth Police Dept., Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics, David Lancaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
