Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Alexander v. Dunn et al
as 7:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Betty Alexander
Defendant:
Commissioner Jefferson Dunn, Commissioner Ruth Naglich, Warden Christopher Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McConico v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
James McConico, III
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, John Hamm, Debra Toney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKinney v. Dunn et al
as 4:2022cv01570
Plaintiff:
Steven McKinney
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Dennis Stamper, Steve Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
George v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Celestine George
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Jefferson Dunn and Ruth Naglich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pilcher v. Dunn et al
as 4:2021cv00204
Defendant:
Gary Malone, William Curtis Streeter, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
J Thomas Pilcher, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Dunn et al
as 1:2020cv01764
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Grant Culliver, Prem Gulati and others
Plaintiff:
Trudy Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hampton v. Dunn et al
as 2:2020cv00385
Defendant:
Ruth Naglich, Alabama Department of Corrections and Jefferson Dunn
Plaintiff:
Maya Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beaty v. Dunn et al
as 2:2020cv00279
Defendant:
Greg Lovelace, Markeon Person, Deon Steele and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Adam Beaty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Head et al v. Dunn et al
as 2:2020cv00132
Defendant:
MHM Correctional Services, LLC, Jimmy Patrick, Leon Bollings and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Rust, Jeri Ford, Betty Head and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abrams v. Dunn et al
as 2:2020cv00011
Defendant:
C O Thompkins, Jefferson Dunn, C O Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Abrams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
